The state of Oregon is largely run by Communists and Communist sympathizers. In one of the latest bills, the state claims to give the right (unlawfully) to a judge to strip law abiding citizens of their arms and concealed handgun licenses based on the judge's own determination without any criminal conviction.
According to SB719, which was co-sponsored by Senator Bian Boquist (R-Dallas), a judge can issue an ex parte ruling in order to confiscate a citizen's guns.
The legislation, which has passed both the House and the Senate, now heads to the Governor Kate Brown's desk for her signature.
The bill alleges to create "process for obtaining extreme risk protection order prohibiting person from possessing deadly weapon when court finds that person presents risk in near future, including imminent risk, of suicide or causing injury to another person."
However, under the US Constitution, the rights of the people are not to be infringed under the Second Amendment. Additionally, the Fifth Amendment is to provide the following protections:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Where is due process in this matter if a single judge determines a person to be suicidal or a threat to someone else? It is simply arbitrary at the point.
Requires court to order respondent to surrender deadly weapons and concealed handgun license within 24 hours of service of initial order, and immediately upon service of continued or renewed order. Provides for law enforcement officer serving order to request immediate surrender of deadly weapons and concealed handgun license and authorizes law enforcement officer to take possession of surrendered items.
Again, this is not to obtain evidence to be used in a criminal trial via a warrant. This is a court order to deprive individuals of their right to keep and bear arms without due process of law.
This requirement of surrendering weapons immediately without due process of law is nothing more than confiscation.
Yet, Senator Boquist has the audacity to claim, "Everyone wants to promote this as a gun bill. It’s not.”
It most certainly is Senator, and you know it. That's why it mentions "deadly weapons" and "concealed handgun license." If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, it's a duck, but in this case, it's a gun confiscation bill.
The National Rifle Institute for Legislative Action opposed the legislation saying, "Based on a California law enacted in 2014, SB 719A would create a so-called 'Extreme Risk Protection Order' (ERPO) that could be obtained by a law enforcement officer, family member, or household member in an ex parte hearing to deprive someone of their Second Amendment rights without due process of the law."
By allowing a law enforcement officer, family member, or household member to seek the ERPO, SB 719A would allow people who are not mental health professionals, who may be mistaken, and who may only have minimal contact with the respondent to file a petition with the court and testify on the respondent’s state of mind. This ex parte order, which strips the accused of their Second Amendment rights, would be issued by a judge based on the brief statement of the petitioner. The accused would not be afforded the chance to appear in court to defend themselves against the allegations when the ERPO is issued. These orders may be issued without any allegations of criminal behavior.
"In Oregon, people who pose a danger to themselves or others may be dealt with in a number of ways, depending on the circumstances," the NRA-ILA wrote. "Under current law, every punitive measure which leads to a prohibition on firearm possession requires some type of judicial process, so people are not arbitrarily deprived of their liberty or their rights. SB 719A is unnecessary and goes far beyond existing law."
First, the following comes from a prior post titled: Toxic New Details About Seth Rich’s Murder Emerge:
For a brief review of why there is so much interest in Seth Rich's death, recall the news from August of 2016. At first glance, upon learning of Seth Rich's death,“conspiracy theorists” couldn’t help but notice the rather obvious absurdity of how police labeled his murder a botched “robbery,” when Rich hadn't been robbed of anything. At the time Rich's body was discovered, he still had his wallet, money, watch, cell phone, etc. He was, however, beaten, and then shot in the back, neither of which is consistent with a typical “robbery,” and certainly not a “robbery” where nothing was taken.
In addition to the decision by police not to investigate Seth Rich’s death as murder, what really drew the attention of all the crazy “conspiracy theorists” was the fact that at the time of his murder, Rich was one of five former Clinton “associates” who had become Clinton “adversaries,” all of whom died under very mysterious circumstances over a six-week span leading up to the DNC convention. Looking at both circumstances together, it's hard to fathom how any well-trained, logical member of law enforcement, would not find any need to investigate the potential for possible ties between the two.
When this story first broke, not only did the police see no need to investigate possible ties between the two circumstances mentioned, but when people did start asking questions, terms like “conspiracy theorist" were thrown around, and police still refused to investigate further.
Now, thanks to a team of George Washington University forensic psychology graduate students and their instructors who analyzed the case and provided their findings in a 48 page report (below), the fears of many “conspiracy theorists” appear to be even more legitimate than ever!
In the following video, Today’s Yellow Snow (formerly Right Wing News) looks at the 48 page report released by the George Washington University Team, and analyzes what portions of the report line up with the theory that links Hillary Clinton to Seth Rich’s murder, and which portions of the report MIGHT not fit.
This report, if correct, just confirms exactly what we have all been thinking. Although those who have spoken out about it, such as Hannity, have received extreme backlash from the liberal mainstream media. Perhaps because they know the truth and want to keep it buried.
This new, independent report suggests that DNC staffer Seth Rich was not killed at random or by way of a robbery….but rather murdered by a third part: a “hired killer.”
Here is a summary of an “all-volunteer group of current and former George Washington University forensic psychology graduate students and instructors” and what they found:
The report states that they told the family of Seth Rich before releasing the details of their findings.
On Page 10 of the report above it says:
"The decedent was conscious and breathing with apparent gunshot wound(s) to the back. The decedent was transported to local area hospital and was pronounced by attending physician at 0557 hours.”
Compare that with the testimony of a 4th-year surgery resident who was actually present the night Seth Rich was treated at the hospital, before “unexpectedly” dying. Needless to say, the surgery resident sure does have an interesting story. If this 4th-year resident's testimony existed in a vacuum that would be one thing, however, it does not as you'll see below, posing some very serious questions!
Furthermore, on Page 28 of the report above, it covers the theory that Seth Rich was “Killed for Leaking DNC Documents to Wiki-Leaks”
Findings – Not Likely, unless a toxin was introduced into Seth
Found At – https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/seth-rich-wasnt-just-another-dc- murder-victim-he-was-a-meme-in-the-weirdest-presidential-election-of-our- times/2017/01/18/ee8e27f8-dcc0-11e6-918c- 99ede3c8cafa_story.html?utm_term=.8703264bc6ed
Analysis – The first hurdle this theory needs to overcome is that a professional killer would have been the offender. Seth did not die at the scene. A professional killer, whose sole job would have been to terminate Seth did not accomplish their mission prior to escaping. Positive toxicology reports would be needed to support this theory.
Further Information Needed to Answer This Question – Any forgiven substance in Seth’s system could support this theory. Any poison or radiation indications would support the professional killer theory, as the killer would have known that once the matter entered the bloodstream it would take effect.
Comments – Such toxicology reports are required per the 2016 version of the DC Office of the Chief Medical Examiner Standard Operating Procedures. Section 10 Ancillary Studies, C Toxicology25 states the following:
1.1. Toxicology specimen MUST BE TAKEN on all case types if possible, even if no toxicological tests are ordered
1.2. Toxicology specimens include blood, urine, liver, vitreous humor, stomach contents, brain and bile.
What’s interesting about that finding, is that in addition to claims that everyone was kicked out of Rich's room except for the attending physician, comes from a report published on June 3 at Intellihub.
Intellihub reported that mainstream D.C. Journalist, ABC 7’s Scott Taylor, was denied multiple Freedom of Information Act requests on Seth Rich, by both the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department AND the Chief Medical Examiner, who could have answered the question about toxicology. Hmmmmm.
Mainstream D.C. Journalist Denied FOIA Requests on Seth Rich, Murder Cover-up Continues!
Are journalists starting to get too close to the truth in the Seth Rich case?
ABC 7’s Scott Taylor was recently denied a Freedom of Information Act Request that he filed with the Government of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department which requested copies of video footage captured at the crime scene by police officers body cameras and surveillance video captured from the hospital where DNC staffer Seth Rich was taken before his death.
Frustrated with the official response, the investigative journalist tweeted:
“#SethRich Update: Here is denial of my request 4 video of Police Officers body cams at crime scene & Hospital plus surveillance video. pic.twitter.com/VDaRO8m8gT“
Two attachments included in the tweet read as follows:
The response from DC Metro Police makes no sense, especially because body camera footage has been released by the department in the past and can only help in solving the case.
Furious about the whole ordeal, Taylor tweeted:
“Body cams in homicides have been released in the past in
An additional FOIA request filed by Taylor was denied by the Chief Medical Examiner.
#DC also denies my FOIA for Chief Medical Examiner autopsy report.”
How deep does the deep state go?
In a post from June 6th titled, Toxic New Details About Seth Rich’s Murder Emerge, it was revealed that Heather Podesta, ex-sister-in-law to John Podesta (Hillary Clinton's campaign manager), just so happened to be serving on the board of the Washington DC Police Foundation together with the Metropolitan Police Chief Cathy Lanier, who served as police chief when DNC staffer and widely-reported WikiLeaks source Seth Rich was murdered in July 2016. Lanier stepped down as police chief the next month.
People have also discovered that comments on Rich’s Reddit account have also been altered to better fit the narrative. Finally, rumors are swirling that the corporate higher-ups are ready to hand Hannity the pink slip very soon if he keeps pursuing the story. This is all just coincidence though, right? Not likely.
What do you think about this report? There are too many factors that do not add up in Rich’s murder. Why would someone who was robbing him, kill him and then leave all his belongings on him? Yet that is the story that the left would like you to believe. That he was simply killed in robbery-gone wrong.
Before we go locking up Hillary and throwing away the key, there is still one nagging issue: Recall that Seth did not die at the scene. If Seth Rich’s murder was a professional hit, the killer was a total amateur because he/she did accomplish their only mission prior to escaping. Considering the list of 67 mysterious deaths previously mentioned that are connected to the Clinton’s, it seems unlikely that a professional hit would have been so sloppy, unless of course… positive toxicology reports show that a toxin was introduced into Rich’s system.
Why do you suppose the Freedom of Information Act was denied? Just sayin…
Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand
In the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS. Cliven Bundy et al, Judge Gloria Navarro has demanded the defendants all wear chains throughout their trials. The simple question is, why? These are men who have demonstrated they are not violent nor have they attempted to escape from the prison system they have been incarcerated in for almost a year and a half.
In a response to the order by Judge Navarro, attorney for Pete Santilli, Chris Rasmussen, cited the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in May 2017 to bolster the claim that his client's rights are being violated, as are all the other defendants in the case.
"Peter Santilli hereby asserts his Fifth Amendment right to be present in Court without shackles," reads the motion.
The motion then cites the ruling of the 9th Circuit Court.
"If the government seeks to shackle a defendant, it must first justify the infringement with specific security needs as to that particular defendant. Courts must [then] "decide whether the stated need for security outweighs the infringement on a defendant's right."
Additionally, this decision cannot be passed off to security providers or "preemptively answered by routine policies."
The ruling adds, "All of these requirements apply regardless of a jury's presence or whether it's pretrial, trial or sentencing proceeding. Criminal defendants, like any other party appearing in court, are entitled to enter the courtroom with their heads held high."
In other words, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals have said defendants have a right to be free of shackles and handcuffs in the presence of jurors in part to maintain the presumption of innocence until they are proven to be guilty.
Bringing these men into the courtroom biases the jury and poisons the well in the mind of jurors that these men are actually guilty before any testimony is heard.
Notice that it applies not only to trial, but pre-trial and sentencing.
The ruling by the court was emphatic in its rejection of routine shackling:
"We must take seriously how we treat individuals who come into contact with our criminal justice system -- from how our police interact with them on the street to how they appear in the courtroom. How the justice system treats people in these public settings matters for the public's perception, including that of the defendant. Practices like routine shackling and 'perp walks' are inconsistent with our constitutional presumption that people who have not been convicted of a crime are innocent until proven otherwise."
"For better or worse, the presumption of innocence rests in large part on appearances. And the appearance of a defendant in court, shackled "like a bear on a chain," can undermine that presumption. Therefore, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that lower courts may no longer routinely of shackle all pretrial detainees in the courtroom, even if there is no jury present," writes Christopher Coble, Esq. at FindLaw.com.
Coble went on to write, "While many courts, including in this case the Southern District of California, permitted blanket shackling policies in the past, that rule has now changed. Going forward, 'if the government seeks to shackle a defendant, it must first justify the infringement with specific security needs as to that particular defendant.' In doing so, courts are required to decide 'whether the stated need for security outweighs the infringement on a defendant's right.'"
"Supreme Court bans the use of shackles 'unless that use is 'justified by an essential state interest' -- such as the interest in courtroom security -- specific to the defendant on trial.'" he added. "When considering a request for shackling, a court may 'take into account the factors that courts have traditionally relied on in gauging potential security problems and the risk of escape at trial.'"
Already, defendants in the Bundy Ranch case have had their right to a speedy trial violated. The prosecution has even stated that they could be held up to five years before it would even be considered a violation of their right to a speedy trial. Some have been subjected by the Democrat Party in Nevada to defamation of character via mailings to hundreds of thousands of potential jurors. Yet, nothing is done to stop the madness.
The government pretty much lost its case except for two convictions in the first round of the Bundy Ranch trials. They are out to make an example of these men to others who are willing to do what our founding fathers were willing to do and stand and oppose a tyrannical government that thinks it can violate the Constitution, the rights of the people, and grab land whenever, wherever and however it chooses to do so without the threat of opposition.
Thankfully, these men realize the stakes are high and they know the potential cost they face in making their stand. However, it should be of great comfort that several of these men were acquitted of some of the same charges in Oregon that they are facing in Nevada, and Santilli had all of his charges dismissed in Oregon.
Let's see if the corrupt Judge Navarro, a woman who had absolutely no experience as a judge before being advanced to a federal judge position by the likes of former Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) and Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah, will follow the law and protect the rights of these men or continue down the totalitarian road she is traveling. There is no doubt in my mind that Navarro is one of the judges that have gone rogue and needs to be impeached.
If you are able and would like to help the Bundy Ranch political prisoners win their case against the tyranny of the central government or would like to write them, please click here. If you would like to support a house in Nevada that is caring for wives and children of these men as they attend the trials, please click here.
French President Emmanuel Macron is offering refuge to American liberals upset at President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement.
In a video posted to Twitter, speaking in English, Macron said:
“I wish to tell the United States: France believes in you. The world believes in you. I know that you are a great nation. I know your history, our common history.”
“If you’re wondering how to get into France, you can either be a Syrian [jihadi] or an American climate scientist.”
“To all scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs, responsible citizens who were disappointed by the decision of the president of the United States, I want to say that they will find in France a second homeland. I call them: Come and work here, with us, to work together on concrete solutions for our climate, our environment. I can assure you, France will not give up the fight.”
Macron also posted a picture to Twitter, with the words “Make Our Planet Great Again” on a green and blue background.
Macron is a 39-year-old liberal who worked in mergers and acquisitions for the Rothschild investment bank in Paris and as the economy minister to French Socialist Party President François Hollande before rebranding himself as an “outsider” last year and launching a campaign for president.
He defeated populist National Front leader Marine Le Pen in May to become the youngest-ever president of France.
It may be because of his youth that Macron is not aware that the specter of a young Frenchman calling out the president of the United States, speaking English with a French accent, may invite more ridicule from Americans than gratitude.
"If you're wondering how to get into France, you can either be a Syrian [jihadi] or an American climate scientist," newspaper columnist and talk radio guest host Mark Steyn said on "The Rush Limbaugh Show" on Friday afternoon, before noting that France would likely require more paperwork from the American climate scientist than from the jihadi.
And as for President Trump himself, The Washington Post reported Friday that Trump's irritation with Macron's disrespecting him at their first meeting may have, in fact, helped seal his decision on withdrawal from the Paris accord.
It occurred in Brussels, Belgium, on May 26, when the new French president approached the line of world leaders, with Trump in the middle, but veered off to his right, ignoring Trump to shake German Chancellor Angela Merkel's hand first, and then the hand of NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenburg, only to then finally come to Trump, who clasped Macron hand tightly and pulled the slender Macron toward him forcefully while shaking his hand vigorously, breaking out into a huge smile — not at Macron, but toward the cameras that he saw were pointed toward him.
At an earlier private meeting between Macron and Trump, the two had shaken hands, with both gripping tightly and grimacing for the cameras, in what some media organizations interpreted as an alpha male showdown.
In what was likely the best, or probably the most memorable, line from the president's energetic address from the Rose Garden on Thursday, in which he laid out a strong case for exiting the Paris agreement, he said: "I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris."
A new bill was introduced last week that would prohibit the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) from reclassifying ammunition in order to ban it.
Representative Rob Bishop (R-UT), Chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, introduced The Lawful Purpose and Self-Defense Act, which would eliminate the ATF's discretion of classifying certain ammunition as "armor piercing" and then banning it.
According to Guns in the News:
H.R. 2620 would put a stop to this for good and accomplish the following essential reforms to federal firearms laws:
Eliminate ATF’s authority to reclassify popular rifle ammunition as “armor piercing ammunition.” The federal law governing armor piercing ammunition was passed by Congress to target handgun projectiles, but Obama’s ATF used the law to ban common and popular rifle ammunition, including targeting M855/SS109 5.56×45 ammunition in 2015.
Provide for the lawful importation of any non-NFA firearm or ammunition that may otherwise be lawfully possessed and sold within the United States. Over the years ATF has used the current discretionary “sporting purposes” standard to deny the importation of firearms that would be perfectly legal to manufacture, sell, and possess in the United States.
Protect shotguns, shotgun shells, and certain rifles from arbitrary classification as “destructive devices.” Classification as a destructive device subjects a firearm to the registration and taxation provisions of the National Firearms Act (NFA) and creates a ban on possession of such firearms in some states.
Broaden the temporary interstate transfer provision to allow temporary transfers for all lawful purposes rather than just for “sporting purposes.”
"The Founding Fathers were clear when they drafted the Bill of Rights," Rep. Bishop said in a statement. "The 2nd Amendment is about security and self-defense. Vagaries in today's legal code pose a real threat to the right to keep and bear arms. The Obama administration exploited this ambiguity to forward its agenda of restriction. It's time to ensure no future administration tramples on these freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution."
Bishop pointed to the ATF's attempt to reclassify the M855 "green tip" 5.56 ammunition as "armor piercing" during the Obama administration, even though it failed to actually fall under what is required to be armor piercing. The plan was thwarted as Americans stood up in droves to the proposal.
In April of this year, Judicial Watch filed suit against the ATF for records related to the bureau reportedly reconsidering reclassification of ammunition as “armor piercing.” They want to know why they were attempting to do it.
The National Rifle Association has voiced its support for Bishop's bill.
"On behalf of the NRA's five million members, I would like to thank Chairman Rob Bishop for introducing this critical legislation," Chris Cox, head of the NRA's Institute for Legislative Action, told the Washington Free Beacon. "It sends a clear message that Congress will no longer allow federal bureaucrats to infringe on our Second Amendment right to self-protection."
The thing is there should not be an ATF under our Constitution. Since arms are not to be restricted and the right to keep them and bear them (open or concealed) is a right not to be infringed on, then there is no reason to have an agency that is known for its corruption that has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of people in Operation Fast and Furious.
Rep. Bishop seems to understand that. However, I would like to see something Constitutional proposed such as the elimination of the ATF.
"The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right of each American to keep and bear arms," Rep. Bishop has stated on his website. "It states that this right shall not be infringed."
All the people who are attending this meeting are totally disconnected from what voters think. Not that votes mean anything to them when elections are rigged to suit their own agendas. They are totally disconnected from reality and have no commitment to any real standards of sound economic policy, justice or good governance.
If you have been following the saga of daemon Deutche bank in the last few years, you are fully cognizant of the fact that this bank has been involved in criminal activity.
Money laundering for narcotics, human traffickers and organ harvesters; currency manipulation and gold price rigging are only a few of the items on their menu. Include the flooding of refugees onto the EU and money laundering for Gulf State billionaires who are funding Islamic State terrorism under its various franchises.
They have contributed to the financial crisis in Europe and were deeply entrenched in the banker bailout programmes after the 2008 market crash. This has resulted in outright theft of tax payers money in order to keep these fraudulent ” too big to fail” organizations going through “austerity measures,” as well as increasing profits for their shareholders and CEOs.
They are also the people, along with most other attendees at Bilderberg, who engineered the EU in the first place and are violently opposed to Grexit, Brexit and any other Exit that will disentangle any country from being financially raped by these criminals.
Ask Greece! Christine Lagarde, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund and daemon economic hitman of note, is attending Bilderberg.
Referendums mean nothing to them because as far as they are concerned, “It is not the #EU philosophy that the crowd can decide its fate, ” shades of Clinton’s deplorables, and as Nigel Farage has repeatedly pointed out at the EU Parliament, none of them are actually elected and representative of the people of Europe, but are selected by banks like Deutche Bank and pass laws for their benefit and to the detriment of the tax payers in the member states who never see a return for their investment in their own countries. Taxes in the last 20 years have become BIG business for multi-national banks and corporations, and not for the people who actually pay them.
They have managed to curtail and put out of business Nigel Farage in the UK and Marine Le Pen in France, but Trump against all odds, still remains at large and a direct threat to their aims and ambitions.
Not only to the Unipolar Corporate Fascist Agenda in Europe, but also in the USA where not surprisingly Goldman Sachs ( another nefarious banker organisation entrenched in the Trump administration and advisor to the Vatican) and Henry Kissinger are in attendance. The same Kissinger who flippantly referred to the deplorables as “zee lozers” who in the last ten years have lost their homes through the mortgage crisis scam; lost their life savings through the criminal Wall Street bankers; owe billions in corrupt student loans that will keep them debt slaves for the rest of their lives; lost their businesses through mega takeovers by companies like Wal-Mart and lost their jobs to China but against all odds, managed to hang onto their vote and put Trump into the White House.
Perhaps by “progress” Bilderberg means either turning the administration around to suit their own agenda, for example the recent bombing of Syria “guided by the beauty of their weapons ” and support for the “rebels” along the Syria-Iraq border with Jordan. Or having him assassinated a la JFK and co.
Although Trump himself is not attending it does not augur well for the people who voted for him and entrusted him with their future. Members from Team Trump are attending. National security adviser, HR McMaster, the commerce secretary Wilbur Ross, Trump’s new strategist Chris Liddell and new Chairman of Goldman Sachs International Jose Barroso, will be present and have been invited.
The Trump administration taking instruction from a group like Bildererg under the Chatham House Rules which provide secrecy, founded by the Dutch Royal family (let that sink in,) is tantamount to treason, in case nobody has noticed. To whom exactly do these people give their allegiance?
They still hope to resurrect the TPP and the TTIP agreements. Trump canceled these agreements and put their programme back at least four years.
The problem with these people is that they have literally got away with murder for so long, that they do not understand the word “No!” As in:
“No, we will not have a handful of hegemonic banks and corporations over-riding the judicial system, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Nor will any Judiciary be “privatized” or “outsourced” so that they can yet again gain autonomous control and turn it into a toll gate system for the benefit of their own profit margins along with greasing the wheels of their own criminality with bought and paid for Judges and prosecutors and no government oversight or accountability.”
“No, we will not have our elected politicians and representatives working for the banks and corporations when we have elected them to act in our best interests and for the benefit of any country as a whole.”
“No, we will not have them being able to sue governments in secretive private courts and steal tax revenue in inflated settlement payouts because health regulations, minimum wage laws or environmental laws have reduced their bloated profit margins.”
“No, they will pay taxes in the countries in which they operate, just like everyone else and not function from tiny post boxes in Holland ( the womb from which Bilderberg was spawned) or on islands in the middle of no where.”
Yes. It will be slowed down and the un-polar, Sauron, Daarth Vader, Voldemort One World Corporate Fascist Government will be replaced by a multi-polar United Nations of Federated States with real equality, justice and respect for the integrity and independence and national sovereignty of all member countries.
Tax payers money will finally go for the benefit of the people who invest in their own countries and pay those taxes. These taxes will be used in high standards of free education (not dumbed down Common Core and OBE) , healthcare, security, transport, roads, bridges, water and electricity.
Tax payers money will not go to entities like the IMF with compounding interest loans that rip out the tax revenue out of any country; the corporate prison slave system listed on Wall Street; corporate owned dams and rivers by people like Nestle charging 1,000 times above cost for bottled water; the food stamp system which greases the palms of banks like J.P.Morgan in exchange for little pieces of paper with pictures on them; or ” universal healthcare” where tax payers money is “outsourced ” to hegemonic insurance companies like Bain Capital, and their pharmaceutical affiliates who inject babies with vaccines filled with mercury.
The beneficiaries of this daylight robbery do not pay tax and go off in their private jets and yachts to islands in the middle of nowhere … where they hold pedophile parties with our abducted children and often torture and murder them in Luciferian Satanic rituals. The days of Bohemien Grove are coming to a timely end.
If anyone is going to have unrealized expectations it is the Bilderberg group. Hegemonic Monopolistic Corporate Fascism will be replaced by real free market economies, a real capitalist system for the betterment of all Nation States.
Price will be determined by supply and demand, not by secret trade agreements and contracts raising prices in order to guarantee regular bloated profit margins. That word, “competition” will become a fashion statement along with a change in attitude where selling more for less as opposed to less for more becomes popular. And rubbish products designed to break down in three to ten years will soon be replaced by quality goods reducing the piles and piles of waste we have accumulated in the last 70 years.
Stricter laws will be implemented against all monopolies in conjunction with low-interest loans for small, medium and large private enterprise. In other words job creators not job seekers.
The farming industry is a good example of this. Land will be returned to the people with subsidies and all genetically modified food sources and the patents and poisonous herbicides that go with them will be banned and considered a terrorist threat. Werner Baumann (DEU), Chairman, Bayer AG, who has since bought out Monsanto is attending Bilderberg.
Ask Russia who has turned themselves around in the last four years from being food importers to food exporters with “real food” for some hot tips in this regard! Biodegradable Hemp will be legalized and will replace petro-chemical products that have created mounds of pollution that we can no longer dispose of. It will also save our forests and keep the planet breathing and producing fresh air.
Import duties will be imposed on all products. This will stimulate growth and industry in any country and give them the opportunity to become self-reliant and productive using their own creativity, intelligence and resources without relying on overpriced imported goods and the Vampire Squid for employment and survival.
As a result we will see the return of the middle class where they comprise of a well-educated, self empowered and economically viable 75% of any population group and where their tax revenue goes for their benefit and not to the banks and corporations or into a bloated government entity paying the salaries of the self-entitled who spend more time sleeping on the bench and playing golf than anything else. Billionaires and the poverty-stricken will be reduced to a minimum. A return to where the USA once was before the coup of 1963 and where Russia, once a communist country, is heading at a very fast pace today, putting western nations to shame!
Like thousands of other people around the world, I have dedicated the last 7 years of my life to the truth movement. Sometimes I have got it wrong, sometimes I have been led down the garden path, often I have got it right. We have all been on this path.
What has happened thanks to the Internet, is that globalization has taken place, but not of the variety that these criminals intended. Like thousands of others, I have had the opportunity to share and talk to people all over the world who I would never have met before, let alone had an intelligent conversation with.
Now Google, Facebook and You Tube with the help of people like Jared Cohen and Eric Schmidt, have imposed heavy censorship, restricted free speech and taken away all advertising revenue from sites that do not promote their agendas. All this has done is give the truth movement another challenge, and I believe we are all up to it. Eric E. Schmidt(USA), Executive Chairman Alphabet Inc.is attending Bildererg.
The Mocking Bird Media will also be attending Bilderberg. John Micklethwait (INT) Editor-in-Chief, Bloomberg LP, Minton (INT) Editor-in-Chief The Economist, George Osborne (GBR) Editor, London Evening Standard are some examples.
Regardless of our nationality, race or religion, we have all discovered that we have a lot in common. First and foremost we are tired of the lies, tired of the propaganda, tired of the fake bought and paid for media and politicians who are paraded in front of us so that we can make a choice, between the criminal they intend putting into power, and the other criminal they will put into power if the first one loses. We are tired of our ballots being rigged and manipulated and we are tired of having our taxes stolen to line the pockets of banks and corporations and seeing no return on our investment in our own countries. Which provides the answer to item number eight. Why is populism growing?
All western nations are angry that their taxes have been used to line the pockets of the military industrial complex and that includes funding for private mercenary armies, for wars that nobody in their right mind would ever have agreed to in the last 27 years.
All these wars have been engineered through lies, deception and false flag attacks. The babies in incubators thrown on the ground. 9/11 the inside job. WDM’s with photographs to match at the UN security council. Gaddafi bombing his own people. Assad and Sarin gas. This is all insanity… disconnected from reality.
Especially in the last six years where we have watched a holocaust Sunni Wahhabi Muslim Brotherhood horror show as Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Jordan, Israel, Turkey, Germany, France, the UK and the USA have all been complicit in supporting terrorists and the destruction of Libya, Yemen, Iraq and Syria.
This nightmare in order to gain total control over North Africa, the Middle East and the territory between the Gulf States and Turkey for an Islamic Caliphate and Greater Israel with direct passage to Eastern Europe and European markets. The cost in lives, infrastructure, the economies of the countries that have been effected and the total disregard for their independent Nation Statehood has been beyond criminal. It is Satanic.
The buildup of NATO on Russia’s borders is another example and not surprisingly, Jens Stoltenberg, the head of NATO is attending Bildererg.
Nuclear proliferation is a threat, and NATO is a prime culprit. What do they expect Russia to do? Stand back and not defend themselves? Or China for that matter?
It is a very sad reflection on society today, when we go through the list of topics on the agenda and the names of those attending Bildererg, and come to realize that these so-called leaders of society, the pillars of communities, have betrayed everyone and everything that western nations once stood for. Quite frankly messieurs et madameuses, you fill us with disgust.
I do not think that I am overshooting the mark here when I say that many people in Europe and many people in North America would be only to happy to take up Putin’s offer of free land in eastern Russia and turn it into a viable and productive business; willingly contribute taxes to a country that clearly has the best interests of their own people at heart and uses those taxes for their benefit; and in the ultimate analysis, help them to fight our own daemons!
President Donald Trump gave a shout-out to the “forgotten” industrial heartland that delivered him the White House as he announced America’s unilateral withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords Thursday.
“I was elected to help the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris,” Trump told those gathered in the White House Rose Garden, as he gave a forceful economic-nationalist condemnation of the global climate agreement, under which the United States is to meet progressively lower caps on certain emissions while subsidizing developing countries in the hope they do the same.
“This agreement is less about the climate and more about other countries gaining a financial advantage over the United States, ” Trump explained.
Citing a comprehensive report by NERA Economic Consulting, Trump laid out the economic disadvantage that would befall American workers, especially those in the Appalachian energy industries and the Midwestern industrial heartland. That report, for example, envisions a potential 86% reduction in American coal output and a 38% reduction in iron and steel production by 2040 if the Paris Agreement’s targets were actually met.
According to Trump, apparently citing the MAGICC/SCENGEN climate model, the most climate activists could hope to gain from America’s dearly bought reductions in carbon dioxide emissions is 0.2 degrees Celsius less warming over the rest of the century. This did not stop the political left from accusing the President of “telling the Earth to drop dead,” by pulling out of the Obama-brokered climate accord.
Trump cast doubt on the lofty goals supposedly motivating the accord, pointing out how it allows to China, India, and even Europe to continue to ramp up coal production while placing incredible burdens on our own domestic industry. “In short the agreement doesn’t eliminate coal jobs, it just transfers those jobs out of America … and ships them to foreign countries,” he told the crowd. “The current agreement effectively blocks development of clean coal in America.”
At several points, Trump took the opportunity to highlight the economic benefits he claims have already returned to the heartland since his election. “And the mines are starting to open up. Having a big opening in two weeks. Pennsylvannia, Ohio, West Virginia, so many places. A big opening of a brand new mine, it’s unheard of. For many many years it hasn’t happened,” Trump said, referring to the Acosta Coal Mine due to open in Somerset County, PA amid the slew of mine openings announced across the rich energy region.
Trump’s rejection of the the globalist economic paradigm underpinning agreements like the Paris accord became more explicit as the speech went on. “It would once have been unthinkable that an international agreement could prevent the United States from conducting its own domestic economic affairs. But this is the reality we face if we do not leave the agreement,” he said before making his appeal directly to the Midwestern voters who put him over the top in November.
“It is time to put Youngstown, Ohio; Detroit, Michigan; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, along with many other locations within our great country, before Paris, France,” Trump said. “It is time to make America great again.”
The President also promised that the withdrawal from the Paris Accord will not be the end of his economic-nationalist reexamination of America’s position in the international economic landscape. “Many trade deals will soon be under renegotiation.”
Is it fair to compare Congress to a toilet? If there is one institution that embodies the corruption that permeates Washington D.C., it is the United States Congress. Dominated by extremely selfish career politicians that are primarily interested in raising enough money to win the next election, Congress has become a cesspool of filth, fraud and malfeasance. The American people are absolutely sick of this, and that is why approval ratings for Congress are consistently much lower than for any other political institution. In fact, at this moment Congress has an average approval rating of just 18.3 percent according to Real Clear Politics. Donald Trump captured the imagination of tens of millions of American voters when he pledged to “drain the swamp” during the last election, but I say that it is time to “flush the toilet” because the only way that we will ever be able to turn the federal government in a positive direction is by clearing out as many of these Congress critters as possible.
Getting Donald Trump into the White House was the biggest political miracle in American history, but now his agenda is almost completely stalled and it is Congress that is to blame.
For example, Trump repeatedly pledged that he was going to build a “big, beautiful wall” along the southern border to combat illegal immigration, but at this point funding for that wall is being completely blocked.
What is the problem?
Trump also pledged that Obamacare would be repealed very rapidly once he became president, but that obviously has not happened.
What is the problem?
In fact, it is looking quite doubtful that a bill to repeal Obamacare will ever get through the U.S. Senate…
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is tempering expectations that the Senate will pass an overhaul of the nation’s healthcare system, promising his colleagues a vote but not success.
McConnell in his public comments and private conversations about the ObamaCare repeal and replace bill is painting a more sober picture than Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), who in March guaranteed passage through the House.
McConnell is stopping well short of any grand pronouncement.
Trump also promised all of us that our taxes would be going way down, but even though the Republicans control both houses of Congress this also seems to be going nowhere fast. The following comes from the Wall Street Journal…
The GOP’s dreams have collided with interest-group lobbying and the tax system’s reality. Politicians all profess to hate the tax code, but they don’t agree on exactly what they hate. Voters gripe about complexity but are wary of losing cherished breaks that are woven into the economy.
“Eventually you run out of ways to pay for your promises,” said Alan Cole, an economist at the Tax Foundation, which favors a simpler code with lower rates. “There aren’t any free obvious sources of money where you can just do the thing and nobody gets mad.”
I could bring up a whole bunch of other issues such as the national debt, trade with China, unconstitutional government surveillance, etc. but I think that you get the point.
Trump’s presidency is going to be mostly wasted if we do not get him some help. And I am not just talking about clearing out more Democrats. Right now the Republicans control the Senate and the House, but the problem is that most of them are “establishment Republicans”. Career politicians from both parties have sold their souls to the special interests and big donors that fund their campaigns, and this is why such a dramatic political revolution is necessary.
Sadly, most Americans don’t realize just how deep the corruption goes in Washington these days. To illustrate this, I would like to share just a few quotes from “The Confessions of Congressman X”. It claims to have been written by an anonymous Democratic member of the House of Representatives, and the following quotes very much ring true to those of us that understand how things in D.C. really work in our day and age…
-“Most of my colleagues are dishonest career politicians who revel in the power and special-interest money that’s lavished upon them.”
-“My main job is to keep my job, to get reelected. It takes precedence over everything.”
-“Voters are incredibly ignorant and know little about our form of government and how it works.”
-“It’s far easier than you think to manipulate a nation of naive, self-absorbed sheep who crave instant gratification.”
-“Fundraising is so time consuming I seldom read any bills I vote on. Like many of my colleagues, I don’t know how the legislation will be implemented, or what it’ll cost.”
-“We spend money we don’t have and blithely mortgage the future with a wink and a nod. Screw the next generation. It’s about getting credit now, lookin’ good for the upcoming election.”
And it isn’t just political corruption that is the problem. When you start peeling back the onion, you find some of the most disturbing things imaginable in political circles. For example, just consider what police just uncovered in New York City…
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio is hiring! There’s a vacancy in his administration for a computer programmer analyst, in the Department of Design and Construction. That’s because Jacob Schwartz, 29, a DNC staffer and former analyst, has been arrested and charged with being in possession of “kiddie porn” involving children as young as 6 months old.
Schwartz is also the president of the Manhattan Young Democrats and the downstate region vice president of the New York State Young Democrats. In other words, he was a “made” Democrat, part of the inner circle of budding influential NYC politicians, who was even friends with Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, Robbie Mook.
Schwartz was caught with 3,000 child pornography images and 89 videos on his laptop after he downloaded them from the Internet. He surrendered his laptop to police, signed a release granting them permission to do a search of his hard drive, and was subsequently arrested. He has since posted $7,500 bail.
Of course, stories such as this are just the tip of the iceberg. There is so much more out there, but we aren’t really supposed to talk about those things.
So what can be done?
Well, we can sit back and keep on complaining as our country deteriorates right in front of our eyes, or we can do something about it.
On Memorial Day back in 1982, President Ronald Reagan delivered a stirring address at Arlington National Cemetery. The following is an excerpt from that address…
I have no illusions about what little I can add now to the silent testimony of those who gave their lives willingly for their country. Words are even more feeble on this Memorial Day, for the sight before us is that of a strong and good nation that stands in silence and remembers those who were loved and who, in return, loved their countrymen enough to die for them.
Yet, we must try to honor them—not for their sakes alone, but for our own. And if words cannot repay the debt we owe these men, surely with our actions we must strive to keep faith with them and with the vision that led them to battle and to final sacrifice.
Our first obligation to them and ourselves is plain enough: The United States and the freedom for which it stands, the freedom for which they died, must endure and prosper. Their lives remind us that freedom is not bought cheaply. It has a cost; it imposes a burden. And just as they whom we commemorate were willing to sacrifice, so too must we—in a less final, less heroic way—be willing to give of ourselves.
There is no war for us to fight, but let there be no doubt that we are in the midst of a great battle for the soul of our nation.
If this generation of Americans does not stand up and defend liberty and freedom, the forces that seek to destroy our country will win by default.
For years, many of us have been trying to persuade our leaders to do the right things, but by now it has become exceedingly clear that they simply are not listening.
So if we want the direction of our country to change, we have got to vote them out and replace them with others that will listen to the will of the people.
I am under no illusion that this will be easy. The special interests and the big donors have a tremendous amount of money, and the mainstream media is very closely allied with the establishment.
But the election of Donald Trump showed us that anything is possible, and I choose to believe that it is possible for us to take our government back.
We just have to be willing to try.
Article reposted with permission from End of the American Dream
WASHINGTON—The House Intelligence Committee issued seven subpoenas on Wednesday, in a sign that its investigation into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 election is advancing in scope and intensity, according to people familiar with the matter.
The Republican-led committee issued four subpoenas related to the Russia investigation, targeting President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser Mike Flynn, Mr. Trump’s personal attorney, Michael Cohen, and their businesses. The committee is also investigating possible ties between Trump associates and Russia.
The other three subpoenas were issued to the National Security Agency, the FBI and the Central Intelligence Agency for information about a procedure known as “unmasking.” The subpoenas are related to questions about how and why the names of the president’s associates were unredacted and distributed within classified reports by Obama administration officials during the transition between administrations.
Wednesday’s requests were the first subpoenas issued by the House committee in the Russia probe so far and showcase the continuing divide within the committee over the direction of the probe. Democrats are seeking an aggressive investigation into Mr. Trump and his associates, and Republicans are pushing for a probe into the unmasking.
The Senate Intelligence Committee also is examining suspected Russian involvement in last year’s campaign. That panel is expected to hear testimony as early as next week from former FBI Director James Comey, who was overseeing the agency’s Russia investigation until Mr. Trump fired him on May 9. Russia has denied interfering with the election and Mr. Trump has denied that his associates colluded with the Russian government.
Mr. Comey is expected to testify Mr. Trump asked him to back off the investigation of Mr. Flynn, according to a person familiar with the matter. The panel’s request for Mr. Comey’s testimony was sparked by his abrupt dismissal by Mr. Trump and allegations that Mr. Trump may have been trying to interfere in the continuing investigation. The president has denied the allegations. Mr. Flynn was forced to resign in February after misleading senior White House officials about his conversations in December with the Russian ambassador.
The probe by the Federal Bureau of Investigation is now headed by former agency director Robert Mueller, who was tapped by the Justice Department to serve as a special counsel.
The House investigation suffered a setback when its Republican chairman Devin Nunes was forced to step aside in April after an ethics complaint was filed over his handling of classified materials. Mr. Nunes remains the chairman of the committee but recused himself from the Russia inquiry.
Mr. Nunes signed all seven subpoenas despite his recusal, according to people familiar with the matter. A GOP congressional aide said that the unmasking investigation was now considered separate from the Russia probe, allowing Mr. Nunes to act on his own authority even while recused.
Democrats on the committee criticized the move, saying they didn’t consent to the unmasking subpoenas. “This action would have been taken without the minority’s agreement. Any prior requests for information would have been undertaken without the minority’s knowledge,” said a senior Democratic committee aide.
Democrats are seeking an aggressive probe of Mr. Trump and his associates, including questions about whether they had any contact with Russian agents.
Republicans on the committee are pushing for an investigation of how the names of Trump campaign officials became exposed in classified intelligence reports based off intelligence community intercepts, as well as questions about how classified information about Mr. Trump’s associates was given to the media.
Mr. Nunes first raised the issue of unmasking in March based on information he received from the White House.
Typically, information about Americans intercepted in foreign surveillance is redacted, even in classified reports distributed within the government, unless a compelling need exists to reveal or “unmask” them. Unmasking requests aren’t uncommon by top intelligence community officials but Republicans want to know whether any of the unmaskings of Trump campaign officials during the transition were politically motivated.
The most recent subpoenas to the intelligence agencies seek information on any requests made by former national security adviser Susan Rice, former CIA Director John Brennan and former United Nations Ambassador Samantha Power for names to be unmasked in classified material. The three didn’t personally receive subpoenas, the people familiar with the matter said.
Mr. Brennan, Ms. Rice and Ms. Power didn’t respond to requests for comment. Ms. Rice in April told CNN she never did anything “untoward” with intelligence collected on American citizens, including Trump aides working on the transition.
Ms. Power hasn’t previously been reported as a potential witness in the probe so her inclusion in the subpoenas may mean Republicans are broadening their areas of investigation.
Unmasking is typically restricted to high-level officials to safeguard the privacy of Americans caught up in U.S. government spy operations directed at foreign targets. Typically, only top officials within the intelligence agencies and the administration have the ability to ask for unmasking, which is approved by the agency that controls the information.
Officials have acknowledged the names of some Trump aides were revealed in the classified documents, and Republicans have questioned whether it might have been improper.
The four subpoenas related to the Russia investigation are aimed at Mr. Flynn and his business Flynn Intel Group LLC, as well as Mr. Cohen, a former Trump Organization attorney, and his law firm. “If subpoenaed, I will work with my lawyers to cooperate with the various investigations,” Mr. Cohen said. An attorney for Mr. Flynn didn’t respond to a request for comment.
Both have declined to voluntarily cooperate with the probe but Mr. Flynn is complying with a Senate subpoena for his business records.
The House panel also recently sent a letter to former White House press aide Boris Epshteyn asking him to voluntarily submit information to the committee. Mr. Epshteyn briefly served as special assistant to the president in the Trump administration before departing his post earlier this year. A lawyer for Mr. Epshteyn made the request public on Wednesday.
“Like many others, Mr. Epshteyn has received a broad, preliminary request for information from the House Intelligence Committee,” an attorney for Mr. Epshteyn said Wednesday.
He added: “This is a voluntary request. Mr. Epshteyn has not been subpoenaed nor do we anticipate that he will be. We have reached out to the committee with several follow up questions and we are awaiting their response in order to better understand what information they are seeking and whether Mr. Epshteyn is able to reasonably provide it.”
—Shelby Holliday, Carol E. Lee and Del Quentin Wilber contributed to this article.